Showing posts with label Nebraska Cornhuskers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nebraska Cornhuskers. Show all posts

Monday, October 28, 2013

I Went There - Gophers beat Cornhuskers at TCF Bank Stadium

As an avid Cheesehead sports fan I try to cut people from the Land of 10,00 Lakes slack because although we are technically "border football rivals", the Packers and Badgers have dominated the Vikings and Gophers for the better part of the last decade.  Since this is the last season that the Vikings play their home games in The Humpty before they play for at least two years where the Gophers play while their new stadium is built where The Humpty currently stands.  As a result we decided to catch a game at both stadiums in the same weekend as a preview of coming attractions and a goodbye to The Humpty.

My buddy Nick and I took early flights out of Chicago to Minneapolis on Saturday morning.  After dropping our bags off at the hotel, luckily we still had enough time to tailgate before heading to see the Gophers take on the Nebraska Cornhuskers at TCF Bank Stadium.  There are some great bars around the stadium and even though it was an 11 am kickoff, tons of people were out having drinks.  Thanks to Nick we had great seats in the first row of the upper deck in the end zone.  High comedy ensued right after we got to our seats when the singleton sitting next to us started rattling off the offensive stats he is putting up in NCAA 2014.  For the uninitiated, NCAA 2014 is a video game, which means we were in fact getting a recap of video game stats from a stranger.

Following the video game stats recap we made our way to the "beer area".  Normally you cannot drink at college football games but for some reason they sell beer at the stadium, which is a good thing for the most part.  Unfortunately they make it very inconvenient to actually buy the beer so instead of selling beer inside the stadium you have to essentially leave the stadium to buy beers.  Trust me, it is nice that you can drink at the game but making it so inconvenient forces you to buy as many beers as possible (two per ID). Instead of casually buying beers throughout the game, Nick and I made two trips to the beer area to get our allotment of two beers each.  I hope they made the beer area to sell more bear instead of trying to curb consumption because making the trek out to the beer area essentially forces you to get as many beers as possible.

There are a million reviews of the Gophers' impressive 34-23 win over the Cornhuskers for the first time since 1960.  Instead of giving a full game recap of the Gophers' snapping their 16-game losing streak to the Cornhuskers, I want to highlight one play from the game and a player from each team that stood out to me.

The play of the game actually happened midway through the second quarter.  The Gophers were down 10-7 and facing a 4th and 10 at the Cornhuskers 33-yard line.  Instead of trying a field goal or punting, the Gophers decided to go for it and quarterback Phillip Nelson hit Derrick Engel for a beautiful touchdown.  Luckily that play happened right in front of us so we had a great view of the play.  Nelson was only 7 of 15 throwing for 151 yards and 1 touchdown but his pass to Engel was perfect.  Although Nelson's pass to Engel was his only touchdown pass of the day, he did add two rushing touchdowns.  I say that was the play of the game because it gave the Gophers their first lead over the Cornhuskers since 1969.

I was very impressed by Gopher defensive tackle Ra'Shede Hageman.  When we got to our seats Nick told me to keep an eye on Hageman and I came away quite impressed. At 6'6" and 311 pounds, Hageman looks like a dominant defensive tackle in the making.  ESPN's draft guru Mel Kiper has him as a late first round prospect.  On talent along I agree with Kiper, the only real knock on Hageman is that he turns 24 before he ever plays a snap in the NFL so I am not sure whether he is worth a first round pick when you factor in his age.

For how impressed I was with Hageman, I was equally unimpressive with Cornhusker quarterback Talyor Martinez.  I know Martinez was playing with a number of injuries but for the last few seasons I've thought his only chance to transition from playing on Saturdays to playing on Sundays in the NFL is to change positions. Martinez is only 6'1" tall so he is not tall enough to play tight end. Luckily Martinez runs a 4.5 40-yard dash so he is fast enough to turn into a quality slot wide receiver if he can work on his hands and route running ability.

After the game Nick and I went to Buffalo Wild Wings across from the stadium to hang with his parents and their friends.  There was tons of talk of the Gophers victory over the Cornhuskers being a program changer.  I wouldn't go that far, especially since their head coach Jerry Kill still is not healthy enough to attend games because of the seizures he suffers as a result of his bouts with epilepsy. For what its worth, the same guy that was rattling off his video game stats claims a buddy of his that works in the athletic department said they are trying to get Kill to take a buyout.  I chalk that up to unfounded speculation, interesting, but but still unfounded.

My college soccer coach Nick Gaudioso had the same condition that Kill does. Fortunately Gaudioso was able to manage his epilepsy so that he was still able to coach but keep in mind that Gaudioso was the head soccer coach at Carnegie Mellon University, a Division III soccer program, whereas Kill is the head coach of a Division I Big Ten football program.

As you can tell, I was very impressed by the Gophers in their win over the Cornhuskers.  More importantly I was even more impressed with TCF Bank Stadium besides the inconvenient beer situation.  As long as the Vikings install beer lines inside the stadium, I actually think going to a game at TCF Bank Stadium will be a better experience than going to a game at The Humpty.  Thanks to the Gophers for providing a nice prelude to Sunday Night Football for the Packers and the Vikings at The Humpty.  Check back later today for my thoughts on the Packers/Vikings game.

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Wisconsin wallop Nebraska in 2012 Big "Ten" Championship Game

Not many people picked the Wisconsin Badgers to win their second consecutive Big "Ten" Championship Game thanks to their 7-5 record including a 4-4 conference record but the Badgers avenged their loss to the Nebraska Cornhuskers from earlier this season in a big way to win their second consecutive Big "Ten" Championship Game 70-31 in front of 41,260 fans.  Surprisingly, Wisconsin only tied the record for the most points scored in a championship game because Texas also scored 70 points in the 2005 Big 12 Championship Game.

Here is a quick look at the first half scoring plays in the 2012 Big "Ten" Championship Game:

- Melvin Gordon's 56-yard touchdown run gave the Badgers a 7-0 lead

- Marcus Cromartie's 29-yard pick-six gave the Badgers a 14-0 lead

- Taylor Martinez's 76-yard touchdown that Gus Johnson called "legendary" cut the Badgers' lead to 14-7

- Brett Maher's 32-yard field goal cut the Badgers' lead to 14-10

- James White's 9-yard touchdown run gave the Badgers a 21-10 lead

- White's 1-yard touchdown run out the "Barge" formation gave the Badgers a 28-10 lead

- Montee Ball's 16-yard "Superman" touchdown run out of the "Barge" formation gave the Badgers a 35-10 lead

- Sam Arrneson caught a 3-yard pass from James White out of the "Barge" formation to give the Badgers a 42-10 lead

Wisconsin dominated every facet of the first half.  Wisconsin out rushed (290 yards to 128 yards), out gained (391 yards to 223 yards), were more efficient on 3rd down (3 of 5 to 1 of 5), and took care of the ball (0 turnovers to 2 turnovers) better than Nebraska.

Despite leading 42-10 at halftime, Wisconsin did not take their foot off the gas, here is a quick look at the second half scoring plays in the 2012 Big "Ten" Championship Game:

- Following a horrible interception by Martinez, Ball's 9-yard touchdown run gave the Badgers a 49-10 lead

- Martinez's 11-yard touchdown run cut the Badgers' lead to 49-17

- Ball prolonged a 57-yard touchdown run with a spin move and punctuated the touchdown run with a stiff arm 10 yards short of the end zone to give the Badgers a 56-17 lead

- White did his best Ball impression ripping off a 68-yard touchdown run to give the Badgers a 63-17 lead

- Braylon Heard's 9-yard touchdown run cut the Badgers' lead to 63-24

- White's 10-yard touchdown run gave the Badgers a 70-24 lead

- Imani Cross's 26-yard touchdown run cut the Badgers' lead to 70-31

After losing 70-31, Nebraska head coach Bo Pelini claimed that they practiced "99 percent" of what Wisconsin used on offense.  That is a borderline fire-able quote if I was the Nebraska athletic director.

The Badgers had two 200-yard rushers: Melvin Gordon (9 rushes for 216 yards and one touchdown) and Montee Ball (21 rushes for 202 yards and three touchdowns) for the first time in school history.  James White ran for four touchdowns but only had 108 yards rushing on 15 attempts so he was only the third best running back on the field in the 2012 Big "Ten" Championship Game.  All told Wisconsin ran for 539 yards in the 2012 Big "Ten" Championship Game, which is the fourth-highest rushing total in school history.

The Badgers are starting to feel comfortable playing in Indianapolis after winning their second ever and consecutive Big "Ten" Championship Game so they are the only Big "Ten" team to win a football game at Lucas Oil Stadium.  Wisconsin continues to dominate the state of Indiana winning their third game in the state in 2012 while outscoring their opponents (Indiana, Nebraska, and Purdue) 170-59 and their 10th straight win in a game played in Indiana.

Wisconsin will plain in their third consecutive Rose Bowl on January 1, 2013.  Hopefully third times a charm because Wisconsin lost their last two appearances in the "Granddaddy of Them All".

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Maryland & Rutgers join the Big "Ten"

With the addition of the Rutgers Scarlet Knights and the Maryland Terrapins, the Big "Ten" is set to have at least 14 teams by 2015.  I say at least because although it looks like the Big "Ten" is done adding teams, I thought they were finished adding teams when they added the Nebraska Cornhuskers (12th team) in 2011.  Having 12 teams in the Big "Ten" makes sense because it allows the conference to play a championship game, but 14 teams seems excessive.

I get that adding Maryland and Rutgers expands the Big "Ten" to the east coast, which potentially helps by adding bigger television markets (DC and NYC) and recruiting footholds, but those "potential" markets come with a number of questions.

For starters, is Maryland really a solvent athletic program?  A number of people have covered the fact that Maryland's athletic department is not in the best financial shape.

Besides that, does Rutgers really give you the NYC television market?  Nate Silver, a guy that did pretty well forecasting the most recent elections, debunked some of the claims that adding Rutgers will give the Big "Ten" the New York City television market.

Obviously adding Rutgers and Maryland is a huge money grab by the Big "Ten" that they couch as adding quality institutions to make it a well rounded conference.  Right, because the Big "Ten" is in a heated battle with the Pac 12 to determine the conference with the best mathletes.  Plus, adding Maryland and Rutgers seems like a bit of a leap of faith at the expense of actual rivalries that compromise the average fan's ability to travel to games.

Yes, attendance of live sporting events is down but alumni attending games on-campus has a much bigger impact than the gate revenue alone.  I've never run any studies but my assumption is that there is a direct correlation between wins on the football field and alumni giving.  If you make it more expensive or unappealing to experience that football game on-campus, I guarantee that you will feel that in diminished annual giving down the road.

Since we established this is an unabashed cash grab, even if the Big "Ten" conference is trying to add new markets, what's the rush?  If you factor in the 27-month notification of intention to leave policy for the Big East, the Big "Ten" would still have all 14 teams in place for the 2015 football season.  The Big "Ten" does not renegotiate their television contract until 2017 so again, what's the rush?

I get that the Big "Ten" wants to be able to choose programs sooner rather than later but money talks and no move is set in stone. Take TCU, they backed out on their commitment to join the Big East in favor of the Big 12 before actually joining the Big East.

The Big "Ten" went to the ever so stupidly named Legends and Leaders divisions in 2011.  Wisconsin will most likely stay in the "Legends" division with Indiana, Maryland, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue, and Rutgers.  That leaves Illinois (former member of the "Legends" division), Iowa, Michigan, Michigan State, Minnesota, Nebraska, and Northwestern as members of the "Leaders" division.  As I look through the "Legends" division, I see no real natural rivalries like Minnesota and Iowa, instead I see a hodgepodge of media markets slapped together for a few extra million dollars.

I wish the Big "Ten" stayed with 12 teams but since conferences forced each other to scoop up programs in the biggest land grab in college sports history over the last few years, I would have done everything in my power to add the University of Pittsburgh and Notre Dame.  That would not have expanded into new television markets like the fallacy of adding Maryland and Rutgers will as I alluded to earlier.  Plus, I am dubious that people actually care about college sports out east even 1/10th as much as people in the Midwest or 1/100th as much as SEC fans.

Since the Big "Ten" will have at least 14 members in 2015, here are three recommendations for making the best of a bungled situation.  First, admit that it was a money grab.  Couch it as a necessary move to save non-revenue sports like soccer and volleyball if you want to try to put a positive spin on the money grab.

Second, in the interest of making more money, add two more teams.  As I said earlier, I still contend the two best candidates are the University of Pittsburgh and Notre Dame but both are probably no longer in play so my order of other actual targets that make sense are taking the leftovers of the Big East: the University of Louisville and the University of Cincinnati.  Some might argue that the University of Connecticut makes sense but that creates some geographical issues while Louisville and Cincinnati make geographical sense.

Third, play nine conference football games: four home games, four away games, and one game at NFL stadiums around the Midwest for the "annual cross-divisional rivalry" game.  Since the changes are all about the money, you might as well maximize your ROI by selling beers at games once a season at least, or is that off limits since only college students over 21 drink?

Keeping all of what I just said in mind, admittedly I am a hypocrite.  I will still watch the Big "Ten" Championship Game to see if Wisconsin can be the most unlikely Rose Bowl representative in Big "Ten" history.  In fact, I would have gone in-person to see the game if work and family commitments did not interfere.  So I guess this post was a long way of saying that adding Nebraska, Maryland, and Rutgers at the expense of Wisconsin playing Iowa annually along with a bunch of other historic annual Big "Ten" traditions feels dirty.  I am not naive, I understand that colleges need to increase revenue, but at some point the ends do not justify the means.